Lewis Had Stated That On May 12
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh dismissing the enchantment of Reviva Clinic, a hair transplant clinic at Chandigarh, has directed it to pay Rs 14.65 lakh to an Australian nationwide, who didn't had any hair development even after the hair therapy from the Clinic. Lewis took an appointment from the clinic and booked return tickets for Rs 75,000, and boarded from Australia on July 24, 2012 and reached Delhi the next day.
Lewis alleged that he had to spend Rs four lakh as therapy fees; Rs 25,000 for every day taxi charges for 2 weeks and Rs 70,000 as resort rental with meals. After, every week of remedy, Lewis went back to Australia on August 6, and waited for about seven months, however, there was no hair growth. Lewis had stated that on May 12, 2014, the clinic admitted its fault and promised for full hair progress with out cost and offered the complainant to endure one other spherical of treatment. QR678 in Mumbai came to Chandigarh again on June 20, 2014 and underwent second round of therapy for ten days. But he once more did not discovered any progress of hair. Following which Lewis filed a complaint on the Chandigarh Forum.
The Reviva Clinic in reply had submitted that the complainant had given written consent for anesthesia and within the hair transplant treatment it was referred that even after therapy hair could not develop.
The discussion board in December 2018, allowing the case of Lewis, had directed the clinic to refund Rs four lakh, pay Rs 6 lakh as compensation, nevertheless the Reviva Clinic moved an enchantment in opposition to the forum order on the fee, whereas the complainant also moved an enchantment for enhancement of the compensation amount. Now a somersault was taken by the OP (Reviva Clinic) simply to defend itself or deceive the complainant on the operation desk itself that it isn't potential to ensure a profitable end result. This consent kind is under pressure and it cannot be used in this situation studying together with the assure brochure as referred by us within the foregoing paragraphs. On this specific state of affairs and the report, consent letters won't come to the rescue of the OP - a certified internationally famed doctor within the field…”
Regarding the enchantment of Lewis for enhancement, the fee held that for filing this attraction for enhancement, the complainant once more had to visit India in July, 2019. He must have paid certain amount of litigation bills for filing and appearing on this attraction on his behalf to his counsel. Not solely this, the clinic filed appeal first and dragged the complainant to this fee to defend the identical.
Lewis alleged that he had to spend Rs four lakh as therapy fees; Rs 25,000 for every day taxi charges for 2 weeks and Rs 70,000 as resort rental with meals. After, every week of remedy, Lewis went back to Australia on August 6, and waited for about seven months, however, there was no hair growth. Lewis had stated that on May 12, 2014, the clinic admitted its fault and promised for full hair progress with out cost and offered the complainant to endure one other spherical of treatment. QR678 in Mumbai came to Chandigarh again on June 20, 2014 and underwent second round of therapy for ten days. But he once more did not discovered any progress of hair. Following which Lewis filed a complaint on the Chandigarh Forum.
The Reviva Clinic in reply had submitted that the complainant had given written consent for anesthesia and within the hair transplant treatment it was referred that even after therapy hair could not develop.
The discussion board in December 2018, allowing the case of Lewis, had directed the clinic to refund Rs four lakh, pay Rs 6 lakh as compensation, nevertheless the Reviva Clinic moved an enchantment in opposition to the forum order on the fee, whereas the complainant also moved an enchantment for enhancement of the compensation amount. Now a somersault was taken by the OP (Reviva Clinic) simply to defend itself or deceive the complainant on the operation desk itself that it isn't potential to ensure a profitable end result. This consent kind is under pressure and it cannot be used in this situation studying together with the assure brochure as referred by us within the foregoing paragraphs. On this specific state of affairs and the report, consent letters won't come to the rescue of the OP - a certified internationally famed doctor within the field…”
Regarding the enchantment of Lewis for enhancement, the fee held that for filing this attraction for enhancement, the complainant once more had to visit India in July, 2019. He must have paid certain amount of litigation bills for filing and appearing on this attraction on his behalf to his counsel. Not solely this, the clinic filed appeal first and dragged the complainant to this fee to defend the identical.
